IMAM HUSSAIN-the true Imam
Author: MUFTI HAFIDH SYED ZIAUDDIN NAQSHBANDI,
Professor of Islamic Law JAMIA NIZAMIA, Founder of Abul Hasanaat Islamic Research Centre
  Home page     View All Books>
 
Category List

>> Introduction
>> The superiority and excellence of the Prophet’s Family
>> Love of the Prophet’s Family and His Companions is a sign of the Ahle Sunnah
>> What kind of love?
>> Love of the Prophet’s Family and the Companion is a practice of the Ahle Sunnah
>> Sermon on the love of Prophet’s Family after returning from the Hujjatul Wada’a
>> Hurting the Companion is hurting the Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam)
>> Imam Hussain's truthfulness
>> Disrespect of the Prophet’s Family leads to misguidance and destruction of faith
>> The lover of the Imams, Hasan And Hussain, (may Allah be well pleased with them) is also in paradise
>> Superiority and excellence of Imam Hussain (May Allah be well pleased with him) Glad tidings of his birth
>> Hasan and Hussain are heavenly names
>> Imams Hasan and Hussain are the beauty of Jannah
>> Love of the Imams is a guarantee of the love of Allah Most High
>> The Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) stopped the sermon for Imams, Hasan And Hussain (May Allah be well pleased with them)
>> The Prophet's deep love for Imam Hussain
>> Yazid in light of the Hadith and history
>> My Ummah will be destroyed at the hands of a few lads of Quraish
>> Ask for Allah’s protection against the rule of lads
>> Yazid ordered the martyrdom of Imam Hussain–A confession by Ibn Zyad
>> Yazeed poked at the teeth of Imam Hussain
>> We feared that stones would fall from the sky
>> We are coming from such a person who has no regard for religion
>> Persecuting the people of Madina
>> Allah’s curse is on the one who frightens the people of Madina
>> Yazid’s army stoned the Ka’aba
>> Shariah Ruling on addressing Yazid with "Radhiallahu Anhu"
>> Punishment for the one who addresses Yazid as "Radhiallahu Anhu"
>> The siege of Constantinople – In which siege did Yazid participate?
>> First interpretation of this Hadith
>> Second interpretation of this Hadith
>> First attack on Constantinople
>> Second attack on Constantinople
>> Third attack on Constantinople
>> In which siege did Yazid participate
>> A Doubt and its answer
>> Yazid did not participate sincerely even in the later battles
>> A question for the supporters of Yazid
>> Conclusion

 
 
A Doubt and its answer

A Doubt and its answer

 

There can be a question about the Hadith of Sunan Abu Dawood that Hadhrat Abu Ayyub Ansari (May Allah be well pleased with him) passed away in the battle which had been fought under Yazid, as given in Sahih Bukhari, Vol. 1, Pg No. 158:

 

Translation:  Mahmood bin Rab‘ee says that I described this to the people, in which the Companion Hadhrat Abu Ayyub Ansari (May Allah be well pleased with him) was present on the occasion of this battle.  He passed away in this battle and Yazid bin Mu‘awiyah was the commander of this army in Rome.

 

In the Hadith of Sunan Abu Dawood, Hadhrat ‘Abdur Rahman bin Khalid bin Walid (May Allah be well pleased with him) is mentioned.  It is also mentioned in the same Hadith that Hadhrat Abu Ayyub Ansari (May Allah be well pleased with him) performed Jihad continuously so much so that he passed away.

 

It may seem that Yazid was present in the army of Hadhrat ‘Abdur Rahman bin Khalid bin Walid, but this is incorrect because Hadhrat Abu Ayyub Ansari (May Allah be well pleased with him) did not pass away when he was under the command of ‘Abdur Rahman bin Khalid bin Walid (May Allah be well pleased with him).  Hadhrat ‘Abdur Rahman bin Khalid bin Walid (May Allah be well pleased with him) led the attack on Constantinople in 44 or 46 Hijri and he passed away in 46 or 47 Hijri.  Constantinople has been attacked after that, in 49 Hijri under the command of Hadhrat Sufyan bin ‘Auf (May Allah be well pleased with him) and in 52 Hijri under the command of Yazid bin Mu‘awiyah.

 

Hadhrat Abu Ayyub (May Allah be well pleased with him) participated in both the battles that took place after the passing away of Hadhrat ‘Abdur Rahman bin Khalid bin Walid (May Allah be well pleased with him).  In the attack of 52 Hijri, he passed away and this is the army, which has been mentioned in Sahih Bukhari.

 

According to the Hadith of Sunan Abu Dawood, Hadhrat ‘Abdur Rahman bin Khalid bin Walid’s (May Allah be well pleased with him) commanding the army and his passing away in 46 or 47 Hijri, Hadhrat Abu Ayyub Ansari (May Allah be well pleased with him) participation in the battles of 49 and 52 Hijri and his passing away in 52 Hijri and Yazid’s participation in this particular battle, all this prove that Yazid did not participate in the battle that was fought under the command of Hadhrat ‘Abdur Rahman bin Khalid bin Walid (May Allah be well pleased with him).

 

It is also proved that the siege in which Yazid participated, was not the first siege, but before this in 32, 43 and 46 Hijri, Constantinople had been attacked.  When Yazid did not participate in the first siege of Constantinople, he is not included in the forgiveness referred to in the Hadith, because the Holy Prophet (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) never said that all the armies which attack Constantinople are forgiven, but He (Sallallahu alaihi wa sallam) said that only the first army to attack Constantinople is forgiven.

 
 
Share |
Download
Download Book in pdf
 
Book Counter
This Book Viewed:
4852 times
 
Search
 

 

     

Copyright 2008 - Ziaislamic.com All Rights Reserved